Jamie Carragher criticises Chelsea and Roman Abramovich statement: ‘Really poor’ and ’embarrassing’ | Football News

February 27, 2022 admin

Jamie Carragher has criticised the statements from Chelsea and Roman Abramovich regarding the owner’s handing over of the stewardship of the club, saying they have “let themselves down badly”.

Abramovich announced on Saturday he was handing “stewardship and care” of Chelsea to the club’s charitable foundation following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The statement came less than 24 hours before Chelsea’s meeting with Liverpool in the Carabao Cup final, live on Sky Sports.

The initial 110-word statement from Abramovich did not mention Russia or Ukraine, a stance which was met by heavy criticism, before Chelsea released a short statement 14 hours later on Sunday morning, saying: “The situation in Ukraine is horrific and devastating. Chelsea FC’s thoughts are with everyone in Ukraine. Everyone at the club is praying for peace.”

But Carragher has slammed Chelsea’s handling of the situation, saying “they’ve embarrassed themselves.”

“I don’t think they’ve handled it really well. With the couple of statements they’ve put out. I think it’s been really poor and they’ve let themselves down badly.

“The club came out today and put a statement out, but I think it was almost trying to rectify what Roman Abramovich had put out the night before. I don’t think they did that well either. It’s not worked out well for them at all, I think they’ve embarrassed themselves.”

Carragher also said that Abramovich’s handing over of stewardship and care falls short of handing over ownership, and claims the club should have been firmer in their stance from the start.

“They should have been a lot stronger in what they said, and regarding Roman Abramovich passing on to Chelsea trustees, that’s not him relinquishing the club, stewardship is not ownership.

“It’s completely different because he’s still in charge, he’s still running it, which is fine. But to not actually mention in his initial statement what was going on in Ukraine, I thought was really poor.”

Abramovich remains Chelsea’s owner and the Russian billionaire, who has invested over £1billion into the Stamford Bridge club since purchasing it in 2003, will not be asking the club to repay the loans it owes him – meaning the long-term future of the club remains secure.

It is also understood that Abramovich remains adamant that Chelsea is not for sale, although there are now questions over his long-term future at the club.

Whether Abramovich will ever return to taking a more visible hands-on role at the club will likely depend strongly on whether he faces any sanctions from the UK government, what happens in Ukraine and how the UK’s relationship with Russia develops.

There have been claims from MPs this week that Abramovich should not be allowed to own Chelsea due to his alleged links to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime.

After Russian troops crossed the border into Ukraine on Tuesday, Labour MP Chris Bryant told the House of Commons that the billionaire should have his assets seized, questioned whether he should be allowed to operate a football club himself and quoted a leaked government document suggesting he should not be allowed to be based in the UK.

What has Abramovich said?

In a rare statement from Abramovich on Saturday evening, the Chelsea owner said: “During my nearly 20-year ownership of Chelsea FC, I have always viewed my role as a custodian of the club, whose job it is ensuring that we are as successful as we can be today, as well as build for the future, while also playing a positive role in our communities.

“I have always taken decisions with the club’s best interest at heart. I remain committed to these values. That is why I am today giving trustees of Chelsea’s charitable foundation the stewardship and care of Chelsea FC.

“I believe that currently they are in the best position to look after the interests of the club, players, staff, and fans.”

That statement was criticised for lacking clarity and for making no reference to Ukraine, Russia or Putin.

Fourteen hours later on Sunday morning, the club subsequently released a second statement reading: “The situation in Ukraine is horrific and devastating. Chelsea FC’s thoughts are with everyone in Ukraine. Everyone at the club is praying for peace.”

So who is now in charge at Chelsea?

Abramovich’s statement was criticised by Sky Sports pundit Micah Richards with the former England defender asking: “There’s so many questions which need to be asked, and to come out with a statement just like that; what does it even mean?

“If you read it, it reads like it’s written in a code – we don’t exactly want to tell you what’s happening, but here you go, read this, pick the bones out of it and see exactly what it means.

“I think it’s poor.”

It is understood Abramovich will no longer be involved in club matters on a day-to-day basis and all long-term strategic decision-making powers are being handed over to the Chelsea Foundation.

The Chelsea Foundation’s trustees are Bruce Buck, John Devine, Emma Hayes, Piara Powar, and Hugh Robertson.

For transfers, executive director Marina Granovskaia, technical advisor Petr Cech and head coach Thomas Tuchel will continue to operate within the budgets set by the club.

Ahead of the Wembley showpiece, Tuchel admitted he understood criticism directed at Chelea in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“It’s distracting us, it’s worrying us, to a certain degree I can understand it, I can understand the critical opinions towards the club and us who represent it,” said Tuchel. “We cannot fully free ourselves from it.”

Chelsea’s history under Abramovich

Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003 from Ken Bates for a reported fee of £140m. In the 19 years since he has spent more than £1billion, won 19 major trophies and sacked 11 managers.

In that time, Chelsea have won: